Explore UAPverseHistorical filesDepth view
The trail map with a third axis, shown beside the published flat map. Nothing here changes the trail.
The Navy and the Historical File
Four takes on why the Navy keeps turning up: the ships that might be the story, a nuclear site that attracts more than one kind of attention, the wider picture somebody may already have, and the Navy's habit of appearing.
What depth means here
Nothing about credibility. Stops sit on one line in reading order, exactly as on the flat map. A connection between neighbouring stops runs along that line. A connection that skips stops arcs away from it, and each arc takes its own lane so that arcs never cross or overlap. The direction and distance of an arc, the size of a stop, the thickness of a line and any movement of the camera carry no meaning: they do not signal credibility, certainty, corroboration or importance. The kind of connection is shown only by its colour and dash pattern, named in the legend and beside every connection in the list below. Everything in this view is also in the flat map and in the published reader.
The trail at a glance
Flat projection of the depth layout. The interactive view loads when your browser can draw it.
No stop selected. Choose a stop to see its connections.
What the connection labels mean
- Documented
- The connection is in the source itself: the same passage, the speaker carrying one idea into the next stretch of the conversation, or the speaker making the link himself elsewhere in the same conversation. The record supports the link; it doesn't prove the claim.
- Shared account
- The same figure, account or claim turns up in more than one source. That's the story travelling, not two independent witnesses.
- Thematic
- My grouping. Different sources asking a similar question, placed side by side because thinking about them together is useful.
- Hypothesis
- My proposal. A join that neither source makes; I'm making it, and I say so where it happens.
The labels do one job: they tell you whether a connection is in the source record, is the same account turning up twice, is my grouping, or is my guess. None of them turns two takes into proof of each other.
The stops
Stop 1 of 4Navy
Why the Navy keeps appearing in this conversation
HypothesisAlso connects to stop 4: Somebody may already have the wider picture
My proposal: the Navy keeps appearing because it is one of the places a wider picture would have to live. Brown does not close that loop for me.
Stop 2 of 4Ships
The ships might be the real story
DocumentedWhy this comes next
The Navy habit and the Russian-ships briefing sit in the same conversation: the ships are one of the reasons the Navy keeps turning up.
Stop 3 of 4Nuclear
A nuclear site can attract more than one kind of attention
ThematicWhy this comes next
Two scenes where the interesting object might not be the triangle or the light: the ships that were already there, and a nuclear site that can attract more than one kind of attention.
Stop 4 of 4Wider
Somebody may already have the wider picture
ThematicWhy this comes next
If more than one kind of attention lands on the same site, the next question is who already has the composite. That is my grouping.
HypothesisAlso connects to stop 1: Why the Navy keeps appearing in this conversation
My proposal: the Navy keeps appearing because it is one of the places a wider picture would have to live. Brown does not close that loop for me.
Every connection on this trail
The Navy habit and the Russian-ships briefing sit in the same conversation: the ships are one of the reasons the Navy keeps turning up.
Two scenes where the interesting object might not be the triangle or the light: the ships that were already there, and a nuclear site that can attract more than one kind of attention.
If more than one kind of attention lands on the same site, the next question is who already has the composite. That is my grouping.
My proposal: the Navy keeps appearing because it is one of the places a wider picture would have to live. Brown does not close that loop for me.